0485@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 months agoBitwarden 100% price increasewww.fastcompany.comexternal-linkmessage-square15linkfedilinkarrow-up12arrow-down10
arrow-up12arrow-down1external-linkBitwarden 100% price increasewww.fastcompany.com0485@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 months agomessage-square15linkfedilink
minus-squarelastweakness@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0arrow-down1·7 months agoI can’t think of a reason to choose Keepass over Vaultwarden.
minus-squarejohn_t@piefed.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 months agoIf you can’t selfhost, then you can have your keepass file in your personal cloud. Many basic cloud services are free and the password file itself is encrypted so the cloud provider can’t access your passwords.
minus-squareTelodzrum@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-23 months agoThis comment should be deleted soon
minus-squareAbidanYre@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-27 months agoNot really and not nearly at the same level
minus-squareTelodzrum@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-23 months agoThis comment should be deleted soon
minus-squareAbidanYre@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·7 months agoLol, no. The mess of databases you would need to replicate what is simple with organizations and collections is definitely not easier or more flexible.
I can’t think of a reason to choose Keepass over Vaultwarden.
If you can’t selfhost, then you can have your keepass file in your personal cloud. Many basic cloud services are free and the password file itself is encrypted so the cloud provider can’t access your passwords.
deleted by creator
Shared passwords
This comment should be deleted soon
Not really and not nearly at the same level
This comment should be deleted soon
Lol, no.
The mess of databases you would need to replicate what is simple with organizations and collections is definitely not easier or more flexible.
deleted by creator