• yesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    People leaving Twitter now is not very impressive. Less “seeing the light” and more “Trumpgret”.

    I’ll remind you that the Debian project left Twitter over a year ago. So the EFF isn’t as fast moving or comfortable with change like … Debian.

    • Godort@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      This is not a contest to be holier than thou. It’s a numbers game.

      EFF stayed on Twitter because it has a larger audience and that means a larger portion of people will see their messaging. In fact, I would argue that the people that are still on Twitter are the ones most in need of seeing those messages. The people that care about what Debian is posting are almost certainly already on Mastadon.

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        I feel like the EFF’s messaging is just not going to get through to anyone still on Twitter.

        Remember, it’s not a fair forum; it’s an algorithm. And it’s not going to show the EFF to users who need to see it.

    • Nate@piefed.alphapuggle.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      From their mastodon:

      EFF exists to protect people’s digital rights. Not just the people who already value our work, have opted out of surveillance, or have already migrated to the fediverse. The people who need us most are often the ones most embedded in the walled gardens of the mainstream platforms

      • Serinus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        I will say that double posting is a completely reasonable solution. More orgs should be the gateway where they can be seen, and have the visibility of the big platforms, but they also offer Mastodon as an alternative. If enough orgs do that, it enables people to just… move.

        It’s hard for users to move when 75% of their content is exclusive to X. And it’s hard for orgs to move when 75% of the users are on X. Double posting allows this to move to 10% X exclusive content, 60% content that’s available everywhere, and 10% exclusive to open platforms. After the orgs move the content, it’s so much easier for users to move, and after the users move, it’s easier for the orgs to move.

        This should be a cooperative thing. And afaik it doesn’t take that much effort to post the content to two places.

      • OwOarchist@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        There are plenty of mainstream platforms to reach such people on that aren’t owned by (openly) Nazi billionaires.

    • Regna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Progress is progress. As any sane people would repeat: perfect is not the enemy of good.

      • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        I think sane people say the opposite - perfect is the enemy of good. OCD motherfuckers like me try to rationalize perfect as not being the enemy of good, but we are usually wrong.