should post something eventually

  • 0 Posts
  • 14 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: April 9th, 2024

help-circle



  • iltg@sh.itjust.workstoFediverse@lemmy.worldEurosky has setup a relay
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 days ago

    not at all: atproto works very differently. fedi instances “do it all”, on atproto pds-es hold content, relays discover and aggregate, appviews show stuff. iirc relays can also implement moderation (such as blocks or bans). right now to my knowledge the only relays are bluesky’s and blacksky’s (because hosting a relay is very resource intensive)


  • i think my point kind of missed: i dont have specific recommendations unless an use case or a set of requirements is provided. most services from big providers are “catch all” because of budget and desire to capture market, privacy alternatives aren’t

    i also misunderstood this as a recommendation for others rather than sharing own’s choices, so I’m sorry if I was annoyed for what I felt to be poor choices (and i feel these are for generic users trying to get free from big providers)

    but really, drop brave


  • this is not good. stuff like google calendar and photos are cloud service, a local app isn’t a replacement and there’s so many good ones. brave stuff just injects their affiliates and ads and has paid models, plus is led by someone with very questionable views. arch linux as windows replacement is objectively a bad choice as first linux distro. keepass is great but again offline.

    yeah, if you want privacy, de-cloud. even google photos is private if you never connect to the internet. we should recommend less bad alternatives with comparable features, talk about compromises and use cases, and generally avoid making such eye catchy “privacy packs” which don’t work for most and are honestly a circle jerk for who already solved their privacy needs

    also there’s no private AI. your local model is built on stolen data, so if you care about our privacy and not just your own stop using ai crap or kindly fuck off back to your favorite techbro



  • iltg@sh.itjust.workstoSelfhosted@lemmy.worldContinuwuity
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    22 days ago

    while i don’t want to throw shade on the developers’ intentions, nor have any real proof of what data is being kept, a fetch request bears by minimum the source ip (which can be geolocated) and the fact that the homeserver exists and runs continuwuity.

    i’d suggest a matrix channel as alternative, so hosters can opt-in by joining. plus, by leveraging the matrix protocol, such announcements become federated push notifications, meaning they could come from any homeserver (limiting ip logging) and don’t imply the continued existence of such deployment, or the software which is being run

    even converting such mechanism to an opt-out “auto-join announcements channel” would be more privacy respecting




  • why wouldn’t it be? you can send emails from web uis too. you can share diffs however you desire. you can have a remote for each developer, and push/pull changes to each other. the github mindset kind of ruined the resilience and distributedness of git: one central remote, one account authority, one central place where discussing MRs… ever forgejo is not as good as decentralized git: what’s a forgejo identity?

    meanwhile git has been decentralized and distributed since day one, linux is still developed in a decentralized and distributed way and forgepub is just not ready and not even close.

    sending emails with an attached diff to many ppl is too hard? make a nice offline gui doing that and we’re distributed. github was a psyop to make us un-learn git, making it better is silly, like wasting decades searching for “good cigarettes”