

Not sure how involved he is but I guess as a co-founder he is bound to be getting some of the Mullvad money


Not sure how involved he is but I guess as a co-founder he is bound to be getting some of the Mullvad money


I don’t think it’s fine the quota is enabled by default for everybody. You want to have the option, fine - but don’t force it on people. Should be opt in.
I was looking on a couple of posts about it recently and there was an instance when (I think) admin of one instance updated it without realizing this feature is in there. That’s problematic.
A symbolic exemption was adopted for encrypted communications—though in practice, service providers do not scan these anyway.
Well I guess that’s something at least.
This truly is bonkers.
Although a majority of voting Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) actually opposed the regulation (314 against, 276 in favor, 17 abstentions), the motion to reject it failed to secure the required absolute majority of 361 votes.
More people is against it than in favor, but the number of people against it is not sufficient so it gets passed? How can that ever be possible?
What I meant is that some people just don’t want to give ther money to Mullvad, since some of it will end in his pocket to finance a political party they don’t agree with.