First of all, I like rust+tui stack and thanks to sharing to community,but I hate to see open source dev wasting valuable time on reinventing wheel on something constantly change. YouTube’s api, webpage constantly change to prevent third party sw. While we have invidious which can be use as backend, why ppl want to waste their time and abandon project quick? Freetube can use invidious api as source for example. What we need make invidious more backend friendly (i always confused why invidious dev not focus on their api only) and able to have single source of truth on subscription, history across mobile, desktop frontend app

Good taste, but bodhi’s dev cycle is pretty slow. Hope its dev’s health getting better. Plz fund this project

Your marketing is really confusing. If your target audience is really self hosted users, act like you mean it cuz the hardest part is integration, too many moving parts. You are too late for Mycroft party. If you set your mind, take a look for https://github.com/NeonGeckoCom/NeonCore and homeassistant. If you can integrate with their ecosystem well, your user base will be more than you advertised here for a year. Let’s hope one day Lemmy is as big as Reddit. Good luck

My Xpenguin won’t work in Wayland 😢

It’s nice to you release as open source self hosted pj and also nice to see py and FastApi stack. There has multiple open source tts sst pipeline, what is your pj’s selling points? I can’t find in your src. Amd what exactly is near real-time? Sub 200 ms?

He did one big rewritten before because of poor gui speed. I won’t comment on of if he use ai or not or code quality, but you can probably search old posts about his rewritten. I do agree dev should keep his git history less susceptible especially in this ai slop age

Oh, hey, I saw your repo is stall for months and I thought your project go south. So you finally satisfied with your gui speed after rewritten? Good to see you make it, congrats. Already find a job? You should really design a good plugin sys with py, to expand more interactive data type. Let me know if you want to hear more.

Their zoom replacement is really expensive. what they really need is providing more affordable services, but that’s the hardest part. Developing features users don’t need just hurt their business. Anyway, if you can afford, their services are good

I think you are also tried to solve same video but different name, release, resolution by different uploaders problem.

What if file name/path change? Scale resolution up/down? Genre/Subgroup in future?

Sounds cool, wonder if only make sense for vid only. What if smaller files like txt, img gallery

With so many new repo because of ai, ignoring their quality, i haven’t seen much update on cad/cam field