

Okay, understood, you would indeed be promoting the malicious file even though it wouldn’t be an issue for you personally. Then agree with the other comment, block it in the torrent client directly.
Huh?


Okay, understood, you would indeed be promoting the malicious file even though it wouldn’t be an issue for you personally. Then agree with the other comment, block it in the torrent client directly.


Thanks for the recommendation, I usually don’t read the articles themselves unless they say something controversial to fact check, but this was a very interesting and through read.


By freely published you mean papers that are published by paying them, right?
They take money for papers to be published, they force researchers to freely peer review, and then they paywall the fuck out of that paper. It’s one of the biggest scams I’ve ever read about, 10 years ago… Thank god computer science, math and physics (basically most STEM) have arXiv…


Dunno, I usually watch stuff with the original voices subbed to Spanish. Most series are pirated from streaming services subtitles included, and for the ones that have no subtitles I have Bazarr linked to opensubtitles and that’s fine.
If you want dubbed stuff tho, that’s harder I agree.


How is it even downloading that? Wouldn’t the sonarr quality profiles grab an actual video file? An exe has no resolution for instance.
Also in my case most video files are transpiled automatically so jellyfin has to work less when serving, so the transpiled would fail. Shit would never run unguarded.


Video and subtitle downloader extensions…? Bruh the arr stack works mostly via torrents (let’s ignore Usenet).


Better never meant good. It means less bad.


They specifically asked not to comment on the PR, comments on the PR don’t give the issue any extra visibility. They didn’t ask not to comment here or to stop making threads, they linked a PR and then asked not dogpile that specific PR.


Do you really need a line to see the trend? Also, the trend has been much more explosive in the last data points, with an exponential line like OP said they used you can fit it much better.
It’s misleading because that line doesn’t properly represent the way the trend is increasing at the end. It’s not a big deal tho.


That red line is pretty misleading tbh. Intentionally or not, but that line doesn’t fit in that data.


What does that have to do with the fact that a pill being ingested has no direct relation with the place it has an effect on? That’s the point I was trying to imply, thus countering the point OP was making.


If we don’t know how those processes work but we know the effect they cause, how can you so confidently say that the hair growth thing is BS? Knowing how it works is besides the point, if we know the effect it causes and it being ingested, how can you call bullshit to another thing having an effect in a different part of our body than where it’s introduced?
I didn’t prove your point and I’m sorry to learn you think I did.


I meaaan, Paracetamol goes through the same process and it lowers headaches.


Linux hardware support is excellent given that 8bitdo is the usual recommended brand. The software part is the one lacking, but you can easily configure it via steam. I have one on Linux, I game without issues.


So he was groomed. Not cool.


Math also fails sometimes, we’ve had to invent new math along the way because math is always correct only in the given constraints of how we currently understand math. If those constraints are challenged math evolves.
Example, imaginary numbers weren’t a thing for a good while and some stuff didn’t work correctly. All math stands upon 1+1=2, we don’t know if that always holds true, for now we asume it.
Yeah stick figures are so Japanese coded frfr…
…I agree with you but you made me think of it and it’s too funny.
Uh, Simpsons? Hazbin hotel, SpongeBob, most of cartoon network… It’s probably catgirl -> anime in their brain.
It’s a freaking picture. It’s not even anime-like, this is more the western drawing style. Who cares.
For context, these are the first three paragraphs of the article. There’s no mention of a single name, it’s basically the introduction. The third paragraph is the statement that they then are supposed to support with facts. This is standard in writing a document:
“”"
Some time ago, I noticed some new organization called FUTO popping up here and there. I’m always interested in seeing new organizations that fund open source popping up, and seeing as they claim several notable projects on their roster, I explored their website with interest and gratitude. I was first confused, and then annoyed by what I found. Confused, because their website is littered with bizzare manifestos,1 and ultimately annoyed because they were playing fast and loose with the term “open source”, using it to describe commercial source-available software.
FUTO eventually clarified their stance on “open source”, first through satire and then somewhat more soberly, perpetuating the self-serving myth that “open source” software can privilege one party over anyone else and still be called open source. I mentally categorized them as problematic but hoped that their donations or grants for genuinely open source projects would do more good than the harm done by this nonsense.
By now I’ve learned better. tl;dr: FUTO is not being honest about their “grant program”, they don’t have permission to pass off these logos or project names as endorsements, and they collaborate with and promote mask-off, self-proclaimed fascists.
“”"
Did… Did you read something completely different? What the hell? The only thing remotely hateful in the first three paragraphs is them using the word fascists, right in the end, and you dropped the article before giving the author a chance to support their claim? Are you 5?
Sorry, that was maybe too aggressive, but you might not even reach this text if you drop stuff the moment you read a word you dislike lmao.