

Removed by mod


Removed by mod


That’s absolutely logic, certainly.
By which logic do you mean? My guess. You don’t know.
Oh, that’s where you go dark.


Heat from sun warming Earth.
When you realize by the
M
A
N
Y
Orders of magnitude…
Ok bye.


Yea… Probably some felonious fraudster convincing people they can be exalted to godhood… Own their own planet… Impregnate all their wives. Populate the planet with their spiritual children.
Yea… Sounds legit. 💯


Removed by mod


That affects latency and throughput how?
Not much.


Lol… Ok…
China has been able to leverage new roll outs while US deals with cost sunk fantasies.


Oh, I dunno. 🫨 Why don’t you tell me why what applies to a subset doesn’t necessarily apply to the superset.


Removed by mod


How exactly are facts and maths cop outs?
There are states with better fiber deployment than Switzerland.
But generally, think of it as highway design. That’s the American way, after all, and it also stinks.
Switzerland: mostly point-to-point where each home gets its own dedicated fiber strand. Upgrading to 25 Gbps can be as simple as swapping optics(multi spectrum) on each end. Some places in USA do this. Some offer 100 gbps, symmetrical.
United States: mostly point-to-multipoint (PON: GPON/XGS-PON) One fiber is split among 32–64 homes. Everyone shares the bandwidth.
And they say Americans don’t have socialism. But that’s the problem. When there’s socialism it’s the public subsidizing corporations.


Switzerland is fucking tiny.
That’s why.


Gotta train them to steal money. 🤑


I doubt this study
Numerous previous studies have shown benefits from fluoridation.
This is damning if true…
Or it could just be they don’t have a valid control that doesn’t have some fluoridation so they’re not really measuring any difference. It’s just taken for granted.


Yeah and if you’re only measuring what’s in the poop, then you don’t know how they actually acquired it, so they could be eating garbage or roadkill or whatever. Which is scavenging not hunting.
Bears are not great hunters. They are highly opportunistic omnivores. They’re nothing like big cats or sharks. They’re not obligate carnivores, and it appears they really don’t want to be because bears love vegetation if you don’t know. But they’ll also eat meat if it’s easily and readily available.
And I imagine if you gave them a choice between the two that they would probably prefer meat most of the time. Especially if they didn’t have to endanger themselves to get it.


Have you tried telehealth?


Odd title.
The study observed associations between abundant availability of plant edibles and bears eating them. This was associated with eating less meat.
And the opposite was found to be associated. Lack of vegetation lead to increase hunting, actually measured as consumption via feces.
Bears being omnivores, this isn’t surprising. Bears being lazy, will choose prioritize desirable plants (or sometimes honey, or likely increasing amounts of garbage, and road kill) over hunting.
The title seems to be a stretch and a prediction unsupported by the evidence.


Stop making sense!
Good news everyone, this graph should start at zero as we are comparing humans to tardigrades.


Dairy and meat consumption.


So the people making Revanced had an argument…
They split…morphe is a hard fork without a certain reddit mod…
IMO, the real talent has abandoned ship and are now producing Morphe.
It’s just like (re)vanced. It’s designed to patch apps so they work more how you want them to.
Removed by mod