Because they didn’t even wait a week since they showed that they can take away your purchases from you library. At least Valve to my knowledge never pulled a gane from libraries, even if the game was pulled from the store.

IIRC it is not the CEO but a co-founder. The CEO condemned it. But it’s all the same, money flowing into Mullvad floes into a neo-nazi group.

The proper legal resolution would be refunding the customer and then settle it between Amazon and the author that didn’t have the rights to sell what they sold. If I buy some food at the grocery store and there’s a recall due to for example contamination, I can go back to the store and get a refund. I can even go to any store selling the same item without an invoice and get a refund (for their list price I think). This is at least the deal in Denmark. This should be the same if something was sold with a missing license or improper license (if it is sold as a product but the license the seller has expires and is not renewed)

They’ve only been caught once before but it’s the third time it happens. The market looked identical between 2016 and 2018 (wiki). China also investigated them IIRC

Something that consumes more energy than you can imagine.

So an AI data center?

The thing about language is probably the stupidest hill to die on. If you’re a small European indie dev, chance is you know somewhere between 2-5 European languages shared among the devs (maybe even a few more). It’ll be free to join forces and create the translations for some of those. Voice acting can also be quality-tested in-house if your game includes that. But if you need to add Chinese you’d often need to hire external QA. I wouldn’t get mad either if a Japanese, Korean, or Chinese game didn’t support anything from the western hemisphere besides English. I’m not even mad that the amount of games that support my native tongue is likely less that 1%. If they didn’t even support English? That’s fine too. That game isn’t targeted me anyway, and I would leave it alone. I don’t go review bomb Fortnite either because it’s not for me.

I was more thinking of being able to “mark” part of the 24/7 recording as a drive to work so it could be found and aggregated later.

You know, it’s free to self host, so I’ll just experiment and see how it works :)

Looks great!

Small question, is it possible to log a specific journey? For example in Denmark you are required to keep a precise log of your driving if you want to get a tax rebate, so if you could log a specific journey and save it for later for tax documentation, that would be great.

Modlog says “rule 3”

I’m on the low end and have heard nothing but distain for AI (aside from “cool chatbot, but why?” or experimenting with local LLMs to find useful use cases). I have also run a local LLM but I just don’t see the use case. Even for coding most of the effort goes into solving the problem, so if it is already solved in your head it isn’t gonna take much time to code it. An no, LLMs can’t solve the problem any better than stackoverflow could (good luck on the novel problems).

Oh and don’t forget to mention that LLM providers are currently socialising the losses of their exorbitant investments through “creative” IPOs with immediate listing in indices.

There is a significant overlap between developers and gamers.

Completely agree, I forgot to mention that part. I am testing a few models ranging from 18b to 26b on my 7900xt. It is far from “make this complete system”, but it can handle some smaller tasks. I think that will be the end goal anyway since cloud models fail a lot at maintainability, security, and other higher levels of thought that goes into coding. They can make a convincing prototype but I wouldn’t hook it up to production.

Local models are already functioning well as a force multiplier. It can help explain logic, do minor refactoring, debugging etc. but with a bit of latency. I do think this is where we’re headed since the frontier models required for generating a full prototype can’t make production quality code and it is prohibitively expensive to do so. As far as I’ve heard, they’re generally running spending ten times as much as they earn per token.

I have managed to lose track of time while reading about how we track time.

Already is, take a look at devstral, qwen3.6, deepseek coder. All can be run on a hugh end GPU and if you’re a developer you likely have one.

I speak gibberish.

It is a framework that allows different AI programs to coordinate their tasks, provide sources for their conclusions, and verify each other’s work without relying on a single central server. It should help avoid drift when solving complex problems.

And the depreciation of hardware is magnitudes faster than fiver optic cables. You can’t slowly snatch up hardware over the course of a decade. In a decade it would be electronic scrap.

I loved it when I first encountered it. It was simple, elegant, and easy to use. Over time though, things got bad. I relied on an extension to show the taskbar on all monitors as well as the “Other locations” tab in the file manager to see disk usage plus some other things but these two broke the camel’s back. Every upgrade the extension stopped working for a few months, but at least I could delay upgrading for a bit. That was until the extension maintainer went AWOL, so no update was made for at least a year.

The “other locations” tab showed disk usage just a click away from my usual workflows. As someone who has a habit of making high utilisation of my disks, keeping an eye on disk usage was required. That was until Gnome decided we were too good for such an easy location so now the only place to see disk usage is in the disk usage analyzer that 1) is rarely used 2) takes a while to start up while it’s scanning the entire disk. My habit of checking disk usage thus died. Until I had to upgrade to the new distro version. And it turned out I didn’t have enough storage left to carry out the installation so my laptop bricked itself halfway. I was lucky that I could boot with a rescue image to clear some space and continue the upgrade but the first thing I did when it was finished was to install Plasma and kill Gnome.

They’re quite likely to survive, even in a worst case scenario. AI isn’t going away and we still need hardware to run it. And in a worst case scenario they still have an inventory that keeps a certain value. For a pure AI company like OpenAI or Anthropic, in a worst case scenario their $100B could be worth 0 the next day. There’s no inventory to sell out like they could in the housing crisis in 2008 or with internet infrastructure during dotcom.

Those who sell shovels during a gold rush are generally safe. They might be overvalued during the bubble, but the shovels aren’t going away. IMO from the little info I have on Cerebras it looks like they’re even better positioned since their hardware is uniquely solving AI efficiency. During a market correction people start caring very much about efficiency and is almost entirely allergic to anything that smells of hype. If they need AI hardware they want the efficient ones.

Thing is, they tried to show that public adoption was large enough to warrant a $100B+ value, that basically everyone wanted AI. That was the difference between a $20B valuation and 100+. But several failures have occurred the last few months that hints at the public at large not wanting to adopt their tech in such quantities and the longer they wait the worse a signal it might send for the IPO. Lack of adoption, lack of progress towards AGI, dwindling returns, ballooning costs.

I estimate that the AI bubble will burst pre-IPO or during the IPO, thus not affecting the public at large. There’s still a risk that they fudge the IPO numbers hard enough to create FOMO and people wanting to buy but they’d have to go dangerously close to fraud territory to make a good case. Just watch out for the first AI IPOs. There’s likely a smaller AI company that’ll go first that’ll be a canary in the coal mine. If their IPO succeeds the big boys will make an attempt but if it fails they’ll likely postpone an IPO indefinitely, making it a long, dragged out market correction, not a quick pop.

It saddens me that they killed the game, at least on PC. Would have been a great LAN party game with their 4v1 mode.