

The liberal democracy is dead.
Hesitation is defeat


The liberal democracy is dead.


The Ineffectives give Maniacs the chance to stay in power and persist in their madness. I want neither.
We can start with the abolition of the stupid first-past-the-post system.


What are you talking about? They’re great at their job, they’re great at being the controlled opposition of the Epstein class.


This was never about protecting the children. That’s just an excuse to further promote mass surveillance and to exempt companies from responsibility for the additive design of their products and services. It’s easier and more rewarding to penalize the users.


Yes, but on average what is the minimum percentage of support needed for an authoritarian regime to remain in power? 30%, 20%, 10%, 5%? Currently, less than 30% of Americans seem to support MAGA. Will that be enough to break this tyrannical trend?


Even setting aside the moral aspect, this is also bad from a purely strategic point of view, considering that Ukraine has been struggling to get enough fighters and therefore cannot afford to let the remaining soldiers starve to death.


Trump would feel right at home then.


I agree with their issue 21 though, Palantir’s culture is truly ugly and harmful. Just look at what the US has become in a few months with the implementation of some of their ideas. That country is imploding.


This won’t solve anything, it will only create a black market and the vape industry will gain new customers.
The UK is on a wave of embracing ideas that have already proven to be failures at other places and other times, I wouldn’t be surprised at all if they instituted Prohibition.


But if he proclaimed the opposite, it would be worse.


Dr. Evil before he lost his hair.


Perhaps we shouldn’t send politicians burned by domestic corruption scandals to Brussels. 🤔
No one should fail upwards.


Because slavery is more profitable.


And the new internet that is on the horizon will be the definitive establishment of these same billionaires as feudal lords.
Counter-example: Epstein. But just continue to collect the checks for campaigning in favour of big brother Zuck, Thiel and their corporate and government friends. LoL
Basically, Epstein was the manager of Putin’s wealth.
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet 10/EFTA01683874.pdf
https://techcrunch.com/2026/01/30/informant-told-fbi-that-jeffrey-epstein-had-a-personal-hacker/
Epstein had some connection to REDACTED from MIT Media Lab and I think that’s Joi Ito.
Epstein tried repeatedly to set up a meeting to sell Putin on the idea of bitcoin in 2014.
That particular meeting fell apart, because Epstein realized it would look terrible to visit Putin so soon after the shootdown of MH17. But I wouldn’t be shocked if they did successfully meet sometime later.
Some people have joked that the only practical use case for bitcoin is to make financial crimes much easier. But what if that’s not a bug, but a feature? Perhaps the whole objective of bitcoin’s invention was to make financial crimes easier for Putin and the Russian mob.
Ito introduced Epstein to Jeremy Rubin (core bitcoin dev), which turned into Epstein directly funding Rubin. Search for “Jeremy Rubin” in the files and you’ll find checks to him, docs about the formation of “Deploy Capital LLC”, potentially backed with Peter Thiel who was trying to invest in Level One and Bitmain. Iozzo was involved in that stuff too: https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01005773.pdf
So if that’s all true, is bitcoin just a bunch of Putin’s money? Nothing here is conclusive, but it isn’t so far fetched anymore, either.
But suddenly, this bizzare email exchange makes some sense. Epstein and Ito were panicking about the feds tracking down Putin’s wealth, because they knew following the money would lead right back to them.
Also, now we might know where Epstein got his mystery billions! Because they weren’t his billions, they were Putin’s.
Bitcoin was probably created for Putin to hide his money. There’s suspicious stuff about it in the Epstein files.


Of course, just listen to the CEO of Palantir, he already admitted that that’s his goal. By inference, we can extrapolate that this is the goal of all major business leaders of these companies who are developing AI systems. They need more data to compete with China, and if that requires the West to have authoritarian mass surveillance systems, so be it.
Yes. I’m much more interested in the new The Witcher 3 DLC than in this, for example.