the way the technology is run and built is in itself despicable. It is an abomination.

we don’t need opensource AI, we need to destroy AI

AI companies do not release any numbers themselves for carbon emissions. Therefore, companies that use AI cannot in any certainty claim to be carbon negative or neutral, because they have to count the supply chain emissions as well.

not adding AI does not stifle environmental goals, in fact you can only truthfully claim to strive for carbon goals if you do not use AI. After all, there is a reason that Microsoft abandoned their emission goals with AI as the cited reason first and foremost, which shows how incredibly dirty AI can be, even if no one releases any sensible metrics.

they burn all their efforts by pushing genAI tech on their platform

people shit down your throat and you celebrate and beg for more. Absolute clownshow.

Removed by mod

This isn’t a “ghost in the machine”. This is “introducing rot directly into the core of the machine”.

Time to boycott all ubuntu and fedora derivatives and distributions. Fuck AI!

Preemptive compliance to the tech fascism of the US?

What a ridiculous and spineless way to live.

and they’re both equally shit because they both use AI fuckery. To stop US tech aggression, we need to ban their weapons (AI) as well!

-is an AI researcher -immediately uses Nazi lingo after introducing themselves

you can’t be more obvious than this about the ideology of AI💀

Let’s see how wrong your explanation of LLMs is: wrong: -conversational: it only generates the most statistically likely text string to follow. -povcet expert: LLMs have no expertise, it can only regurgitate text strings that are most likely, based on stealing the creative and scientific output of actual experts: humans What isn’t wrong is “real time responses”, as long as LLM providers decide they provide that, because people using their shitty statistical parrot is costing them their bottom line.

Anyways, you read like a giant AI-Booster. Did your LLM-Mother write this for you? You can’t do Werkimmanenzanalyse on technology! Death of the author cannot apply to actual, society affecting changes. But it’s ok, I can just block you for your “Mein AI-Kampf” screed here.

the issue isn’t the kink association. The issue is that the word used to be used as a slur for disabled folks.

principled technologists would of course say that the guillotine and beheadings are also technological inevitabilities, so why resist?

I think the difference here is, at least we can use the tech I mentioned defensively. However, using genAI and LLMs is always adding to Jensen Huangs bottom line only, and its a loss to everyone else. You don’t happen to be a direct relative? Because otherwise you must feel really ridiculous to do free marketing for him

AI bros love to normalize their fascist technology by saying that it’s inevitable.

admitting to intentionally deskilling yourself has to be humiliating. Ouch.

web office products from microslop have reduced functionality in comparison to desktop variants, which is most obvious with Powerpoint. However, for sleek designs, canva might work better already, just the interoperability of the m365 office suite between multiple users at once keeps it at the front of the market.