I think that’s a silly thing to say given that the arch wiki is the most comprehensive source of up to date technical Linux knowledge available to everybody. If you mean support for people on the distro itself, it does explicitly market itself to people who are already knowledgeable and willing to be their own support, so idk what you’d expect

Lenovo is the largest laptop manufacturer in the world by market share, and they’ve offered Linux preinstalled on many laptops and desktops for at least a decade

I use this layout somebody on their GitHub made that is similar to the IOS keyboard. I tweak it a little but it’s a good starting point: https://github.com/HeliBorg/HeliBoard/discussions/2180

I just use the native android private space profile, good enough for my use case

The Japanese delicacy “uni” is urchin gonads

Are you trolling or just this ignorant? If you’re referring to the US laws on this, a PIN can’t be required from you. Any biometrics can. So a PIN already protects you from the authorities using their legal route to get into your phone via your compliance.

I’d be interested if they had WiFi calling, RCS, and other basics implemented. Hard to say how true the service is to its claims, but the feature set sounds compelling

Even the premise that LLMs write as good of code as a human today is marketing BS. I work in software, I’ve seen what Claude code does when set loose on our repos already. Its output is unreliable, inefficient, doesn’t meet security standards, and always requires manual intervention to bug-fix. It produces worse code much faster

Replicating this on Linux would be as simple as ln -s to make a symbolic link

Damn it’s like they don’t want the system working at all, that’s so convoluted and unnecessary

Proton mail doesn’t require a phone number

I find it especially egregious that they’d use that metric as justification when most of these tech companies have internal LLM usage quotas you must hit lest you be reprimanded or fired. So you’re forced to use the tool despite its garbage results, then that very same usage is quoted as reason for losing your job

DuckDNS might be useful idk

This wouldn’t really negate what I’m talking about in terms of their organizational advantages or the argument I’m making about them not just “throwing people” at the problem. But also, I don’t see any evidence that this is true; it seems their hiring strategy is to grab researchers that recently graduated from top Chinese universities as their talent

This is moronic and entirely divorced from the facts. Look at key players in the Chinese LLM space like Deepseek: it’s a tiny team of less than 200 people, building models that rival US tech firms with thousands. They make breakthroughs by pushing research first and intensive planning, rather than brute force. These are immensely innovative and creative teams with a great approach to R&D and engineering above all else

I’ve written open source code and contributed to many projects. I’m more than familiar with the licensing. Some licenses like MIT give permissive rights away to businesses for private use, but copyleft ones like GPL and AGPL families (which are massively popular) absolutely do not, not without all resultant code being open source and GPL as well which is obviously not the case with LLM generated shit. Educate yourself before spewing nonsense please

Open source does not mean royalty free or public domain. Those individual developers who put in that labor have rights as workers, and they express them through their software licenses. It’s absolutely no different than stealing artwork or music for training data, it’s just a different medium of self expression and creativity. Your argument is like saying that since artists have digital catalogues to show off and market their work, they deserve to have it stolen for training data too.

And if the drill was stealing hard work of open source communities and was constantly making fatal but hard to spot errors and telling you the screw is in when it is not

I mean it’s a deeply intimate, trusting, vulnerable thing, and neither party here is directly consenting to sharing or being made to watch. It’s a violation of consent and boundaries, of course it can be traumatic

Why is Rust your problem here? It’s a fantastic language. The issue is licensing