• 0 Posts
  • 41 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 9th, 2023

help-circle

  • Eggymatrix@sh.itjust.workstoLinux@lemmy.mlScreensavers on Wayland
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Wayland devs develop stuff for wayland and most of them work for free, those that are payd are usually payd to do stuff that is needed by their employer. Spoiler alert: employers don’t give a damn about screensavers.

    If you need additional stuff you need to either develop it yourself, or pay someone to do it for you.

    This attitude of pressuring devs to do the work for you works if you pay for something, in opensource it is usually frowned upon.

    People can complain all they like, if it ain’t useful to those who pay or those who work on it, it won’t be done.

    In my opinion that is a feature not a bug.


  • Why are screensavers still used?

    Nothing that causes pixels to change color “saves” anything these days, unless you have some kind of old LCD display.

    Wayland has no limitations for how a traditional screensaver should work, nobody bothered to implement one, that is why there isn’t one yet IMO.

    Hate to be the guy but if you need one you either need to hack something on top of xscreensaver like others in the thread said, or implement something native for those that need it to protect their old monitor.

    That said, in case you don’t actually need a screensaver but a looping video for a kiosk type of situation you might just setup a videoplayer in a loop and turn off screen power saving.







  • You seem to think that the idea is that linux and most FOSS projects are some carebear nonprofit charity organization. You are wrong.

    In most cases the idea is that open source work is there because it is easier to share technological progress if multiple companies work at it. And because of this it is just better than the alternative. The linux kernel is worked on by multiple large corporations that are in the business of making money using servers. If these servers run better then they make more money. To make them run better for them they need to implement their features and because of the licence and the ecosystem they need to publish these modifications back to the upstream.

    All this works so good because a lot of companies make a lot of money with it.

    Github will be used as long as it does not interfere with the workflow or with the legal aspects, nobody cares about the spirit nearly as much as you think



  • Yet again a reminder that flathub solves a problem most people don’t have, and most users het confused with what it does.

    We have had granular permissions for users on systems for 50 years, and virtual machines for 30 years, yet people keep using the wrong tool for the job just because the wrong tools keep getting popilar for some damn reason.

    OP you are using your flatpack terminal wrong, the processes it launches do not inherit the constraints, or at least are not forced to follow them. Use a separate user account for that.



  • The main issue is that nobody is able to come up with anything better. I use systemd because it made my job hugely easier and soved many problems. The main guy is an asshole but his work is good when you use it as he intended, which kind of is the point of open source.

    If you don’t like it you fork and do your own thing, until now nobody bothered, and this is telling.

    Poettering did respectable work in snarky fields like audio and init nobody wanted to do something in and everybody complained about. I respect that despite he behaving like a spoiled asshole




  • Yes and no. It would be an issue if the coreutils were actually something difficult to do, but the main difficulty that project is encountering is just keeping bug-accurate compatibility. The fact they actually managed to get something working in a couple months is the indicator that it is not really that gamechanging.

    Now a kernel or a browser on the other hand are another beast.


  • Gentoo, along with arch and their derivatives are more advanced distros, that will require you to actually learn stuff to be able to use them.

    That said, if you are motivated and have the time there is no reason to not try, and the arch wiki and installation manual are in my experience very good at explaining everything you need to know on the system side.

    I know that the gentoo handbook is also very good, and the main difference between gentoo and arch is that there is the additional uncommon step to build everything from source, kernel included.

    You could go with gentoo directly, but since you seem searching for a progression I do recommend to try arch first before going to the gentoo endgame.