Snap is why I don’t recommend it to anyone. It’s super aggressive and responsible for problems (famous example). It also gives Linux a bad impression to new users who still think Ubuntu is a “vanilla” distro. Watching Gamers Nexus struggle with the Steam package is a good example of this, I think. Steve came out ahead of the comments, saying, “I’m sure lots of people know [you need to use the purge flag].” Actually I didn’t know that because I avoid hostile distros that constantly fight me.

+1 for Mint. Snapbuntu must be dethroned as the default beginner distro.

I bought some cheap “Sceptre” TV on Amazon 4 years ago. You’re not going to be able to walk into a Best Buy or Walmart and find one, that’s for sure.

Respectfully disagree. I can only speculate why other developers choose MIT. But for small and medium-sized projects, a more restrictive license is unlikely to protect them from this scenario anyway. And if that’s true, one could argue it’s better to go down a road where corporate sponsorships are potentially more likely.

Personally, I often choose MIT because I don’t care who uses my code and for what, and I’d prefer that it be easy to borrow from. I used to be concerned about how my code was used, but over the years I’ve developed a strong dislike for copyright as a concept in general so I fight it how I can. Some of my projects are so simple that even MIT seems like overkill. In those cases I use the Unlicense.