You have clearly and concisely explained the exact reason the US wouldn’t and couldn’t allow China to invade Taiwan (well, wouldn’t under a rational administration).

Let non-members represent themselves during contract negotiations, or be represented by the union if they are a member. The problem with non-members getting the same benefits as members is that there’s no motivation to be a member in the first place, which means the union has less funds and less negotiating power.

Union benefits shouldn’t be given to non-members.

And China also can’t really invade because all the facilities that make the silicon are rigged to self destruct if China puts boots on their soil, at least last I heard.

If Tesla is telling the truth about the driver’s behavior then yeah, sure, they are almost certainly in the clear here. However, they have definitely not earned the trust required for me to just take them at their word that such is the case, so the facts can come out in litigation.

Yeah, I can agree with that.

Frankly I was under the impression they weren’t invited, completely justifiably.

China wasn’t running an embassy here.

You are magnitudes more likely to be shot by your own gun, be it by yourself or a family member, than you are to need to use that gun against a home invader. Thus, it’s significantly safer for you to keep your gun safely locked away where it can’t hurt you rather than leaving it accessible to protect from the much lower risk of an attacker.

Only problem I see with that plan is buying that much gas is just too expensive to be done.

Can I choose John Forester instead?

Normalize Pedestrian Scrambles!

Is this the one who’s airbag was also sabotaged to not deploy in a crash, making the whole thing look like a very obvious assassination attempt?

And 93% of adults are liars.

Neither hexavalent chromium nor arsenic appears in Tesla’s TCEQ discharge permit as an allowable pollutant. Neither was tested for during TCEQ’s February investigation.

…Yeah, the headline is actually right, I didn’t expect Claude to be pro-union like that.

According to the support page (found here: https://support.google.com/recaptcha/answer/16609652) if you are browsing on a phone it will prompt you to click a link to open some kind of Captcha app on the device rather than scanning a QR code.

I don’t believe there is anything that requires something unique about the Switch 2 to run, so emulating the original Switch should get you all the games already.

You don’t think unpredictable tariffs and rampant deregulation across the entire economy have had an effect on prices?

It’s misleading because saying “search the computer” implies a breadth of scan that isn’t present. That’s like saying a website “searches the computer” to grab cookies generated by that site; technically true but worded to be misleading.

To be clear this is bad, but it’s important to be clear when explaining why it is bad to avoid creating resentment when the person you are explaining it to looks deeper into it themself and finds that it’s not as bad as your explanation was implying.