I’m a dude in Oregon. I regularly make bad life decisions and do not make a habit of learning from my mistakes.
I hate that one misclick can delete my comment.
Would that be a natural, logical discernment for someone trying to figure out why chlorophyll is green? I say that this is an unhinged take and everyone siding with it should feel like… an amount of bad. It’s pretty misleading by virtue.
Oh, damn. Reductionist.
I mean, yeah. I’m reaching for the, “why”, though. Specifically for chlorophyll, which reflects light with a specificity. As does carotene in dying trees in the fall.
Are you saying that chlorophyll naturally evolved to take in specific wavelengths of light given the availability of light in specific frequencies in response to how the sun’s light moves through our amosphere? I would get it, but that would be so frustrating of a response to, “why air blue matter”.
I’m still not following. What part of “blue air” imparts chlorophyll with its color? I get the sun. I understand how light works (reflection, refraction, and scattering). I understand our perception of light on a neuological level (including post-processing) to an extent that most people haven’t studied. Why “blue” air make green plant?
I mean, I love it and thanks for sharing, but it’s a pretty poor discernment for why “blue air” makes chlorophyll green. Sure, plants might be opportunistic in a respect and attempt to move to a color direction that gathers the maximum amount of the sun’s rays. Why was the initial post, “sky blue, sun yellowish = plant green”? Why was that met with agreement?
It’s not something that any Biologist would yield to as an explanation. Even if they respected themselves. (Sorry, Biologists. I know.)