Researchers say that using artificial-intelligence tools to visualize scientific images can become problematic when models misrepresent the underlying data.
“Ai is useful in science” they all sang in chorus
“It’ll be faster and better than humans” supporters of self driving cars saida decade ago, while making musk a trillionaire fascist.
“Look ma, no hands!” Said the sucker, moments before the Tesla crashed, engulfing the idiot in chemical fire death oven in yet another avoidable test drive that Tesla obviously told people not to do.
“Call it super intelligence or you’re a traitor” said the President of the United States of America, after the Supreme Court voted to protect him from a decades long string of an unknown number of child rapes and murders from being investigated and preventing millions of pages of criminal evidence being released
Glad they caught and disqualified it. Fucked up that some asshole thought it was okay to submit it.
Nikon includes ai as part of their software package, it’s built in and was promoted to us by their reps when they installed our confocal microscope. Are they angry because it didn’t use their proprietary ai?
But that’s not genrative AI. “his team had used an AI model in post-processing to enhance the visual presentation of the regions below the cilia “without making anatomical claims about what those rendered features represent”.” They made up the entire bottom of the video.