• Riskable@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Either a lot more tools got a lot better,

    That’s what it was. Even the free, open source models are vastly superior to the best of the best from just a year ago.

    People got into their heads that AI is shit when it was shit and decided at that moment that it was going to be stuck in that state forever. They forget that AI is just software and software usually gets better over time. Especially open source software which is what all the big AI vendors are building their tools on top of.

    We’re still in the infancy of generative AI.

    • XLE@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      If you read AI critics, you will see people presenting solid financial evidence of the failure of AI companies to do what they promised. Remember Sam Altman promised AGI in 2025? I certainly do, and now so do you.

      Do you have any concrete evidence that this financial flop will turn around before it runs out of money?

      • Riskable@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Assume all the big AI firms die: Anthropic, OpenAI, Microsoft, Google, and Meta. Poof! They’re gone!

        Here would be my reaction: “So anyway… have you tried GLM-7? It’s amazing! Also, there’s a new workflow in ComfyUI I’ve been using that works great to generate…”

        Generative AI is here to stay. You don’t need a trillion dollars worth of data centers for progress to continue. That’s just billionaires living in an AGI fantasy land.

  • Mongostein@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Linux kernel czar?

    I’m curious about this but I refuse to click the link because that just sounds so fucking stupid.

    • inari@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      The headline is stupid but the article is interesting. Greg is saying that since last month for some unknown reason, AI bug reports have gotten good and useful, and something current Linux maintainers can handle.

      • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        It’s not just bug reports; in the last month, AI driven development has actually gone from slop to reliably better than the average human.

        That’s not saying it’s writing better code, just that managing the development process and catching regular bugs is now better than when run by a junior analyst.

        Makes sense that a properly balanced model with randomization turned down should be able to recognize when something is being done outside the acceptable parameters.

        • The_Decryptor@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          It’s not just bug reports; in the last month, AI driven development has actually gone from slop to reliably better than the average human.

          Funny, I heard that same claim about 6 months ago.

          And I’m sure I’ll hear it again in another 6 months or so.

          • justgohomealready@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            I’m a xennial developer. I"ve been coding for 30 years. AI now codes better (and a thousand timed faster) than most mid-level developers. The company I work for has not hired a single junior dev for months now. The new paradigm is a senior dev controlling a team of AI agents. It feels like it doesn’t even make sense to think of training juniors, because at this rate even seniors will be obsolete in a year or two.

            AI in the software dev world is not hype.

            • Den Vennlige Fyren@europe.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              Every single comment made by this person in the past three months is pro-AI. Every. Single. One.

              Do you work for Anthropic? Perhaps, you are an LLM?

              AI now codes better (and a thousand timed faster) than most mid-level developers.

              You, if you are indeed a real person, might be overestimating your proficiency, it happens.

        • tomalley8342@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Makes sense that a properly balanced model with randomization turned down should be able to recognize when something is being done outside the acceptable parameters.

          I don’t know how you gathered such a sense when that not being true has been the main laughing point for AI since its inception. Meta AI security and safety researcher Summer Yue’s “Nothing humbles you like telling your OpenClaw ‘confirm before acting’ and watching it speedrun deleting your inbox” was just last month btw.