• rants_unnecessarily@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Ummm… Isn’t this precisely against the whole EU’s make sideloading (ie. installing) as easy as main app store installing thing?
    Taking steps backwards…

    • General_Effort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I doubt it. EU regulations demand all manner of documentation, including who supplied software. Tech companies should also protect users and enforce “our” laws, which means a lot of surveillance.

      App stores already have to do developer verification, under the celebrated DMA.

      There’s a pro-business loophole meant to keep bureaucracy low. Very small companies are exempted. It’s kind of ironic, because Lemmy usually hates this kind of pro-business anti-regulation thing. To be fair, using this loophole to shield devs, as F-Droid wants, is an abuse. It’s only meant to allow small companies to grow until they have the resources to handle the verification.

      • Kilgore Trout@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        It’s only meant to allow small companies to grow until they have the resources to handle the verification.

        Most projects served by F-Droid are not backed by companies. Then they are righfully exempted from the DMA, it’s not a “loophole”.