• Zagorath@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Yeah that seems to be how Wikipedia does things. It tripped me up earlier today on a different page. Bizarre. Just go left to right, top to bottom. Reading order.

      • sbeak@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        I believe this is because many languages will interpret that differently, and Wikipedia having contributors from around the world writing in different languages, decided that clockwise is a good universal instruction that is more difficult to mistranslate.

        If the instructions were “left to right” and then “top to bottom”, a bad translation might end up making it mean the top to bottom first and left go right last.

        Reading order

        In Arabic (and a few other languages too), things are read RTL, and plenty of Asian languages, at least traditionally, are read top to bottom first.

        Doing it clockwise is seen as a more universal instruction I guess? And I don’t think it’s too hard to figure out. I might also be to make the instruction more concise!

        • Zagorath@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Wikipedia has entirely different versions in different languages. This page is on the English Wikipedia.

          • sbeak@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 hours ago
            1. having something consistent can reduce confusion among contributors, particularly for those who are translating pages between languages and

            2. there are other reasons too, like making the instruction more concise

      • yetAnotherUser@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Clockwise order isn’t the same as reading order. The correct order is:

        1. The top left image (because it says “from top left”)
        2. The top right image
        3. The bottom right image
        4. The bottom left corner

        It helps if you imagine a circle around the images with arrows pointing in clockwise direction, like this:

        Drawing of 4 squares in a 2x2 grid, which represent the pictures. A circle with arrows pointing in a clockwise direction surrounds the squares. The squares are numbered according to the order described above.

        They could have just put the images in reading order though, especially when there are only 4 of them. It would be way less confusing :/

        • Zagorath@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Clockwise order isn’t the same as reading order

          Yes, I know. That’s what my comment is criticising.