Why would I pay them for something they didn’t do?

That’s different than AI tho

That’s an example of a computer being utilized in the way ut should be (with predictable outcomes

You know, acting like a dickhead doesn’t really strengthen your argument.

I’ll speak to someone less pompous about this

Emergent behavior meaning what?

Which “microscopic” differences?

1. They’re in a cult that was founded by someone who has no expertise or understanding of the technology.

He watched a bunch of sci-fi movies and got shook because he’s a god damn moron. He has since started researching things, but it is all under the guidance of his ungrounded beliefs. Confirmation bias.

Their “movement” is literally based off of a Harry Potter fan fiction novel.

Taking them seriously is equivalent to taking the Scientologists seriously. Do you think the Scientologists know the most about space just because they spend the most time reading stories about it?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rationalist_community

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harry_Potter_and_the_Methods_of_Rationality

These are not serious people

Based on what? I have seen no evidence to the contrary

There is/has been a cult of dumbassess who think they’re creating a digital god for many years now

Google “rationalists” or “zizians”

It’s not really good marketing, imo, to show everyone that you hire insane morons.

Look up “rationalists” and “zizians”

It will quickly become clear to you that the dichotomy is caused by one side being completely off their fucking rockers.

Likely because not downvoting it could serve to Inadvertently legitimize the technology when others see it with a positive score, and most people on Lemmy don’t want to do that.

Google ruined fucking Google maps, a product that did not need improving, with AI. It now hallucinates the location of addresses and will send you to a completely unrelated part of the city. This began happening to me multiple times a week.

I drive for work, so that was unacceptable to me, and I deleted Google Maps and reverted to Apple Maps about a month ago. Guess how many times Apple Maps has taken me to the wrong location in the one month I’ve spent using it? Fucking zero.

Google can suck shit, they’re not a serious company anymore.

They’re in a cult

Look up “Rationalists” and “Zizians”

These are not serious people, and we’d do well to stop taking them seriously

Nah, Xavier sounds like some dork ass Gen Alpha kid

I only recognize Amon-Ra and Allah

Saturn car cult?

No more diarrhea for me I guess

Not at all, they’re literally in a cult

Look up “rationalists” or “zizians”, you can read all about it and see how fucking crazy they are (also dumb)

you read it, keep in the fact that the person who invented all of this, the leader of these movements, knows nothing about technology. He read a bunch of and got shook. He doesn’t know shit about or AI.

Also, China isn’t trying to catch up because they correctly recognized the inherent worthlessness of the technology

Interesting, the phrasing did seem to imply there would be a greater number than 20, but I appreciate the confirmation (and bonus knowledge)

10 out of 10 then?

How many bladder cancers are there?

What they mean is that dating apps have been enshitified to the point that most of them no longer function.

Fair enough, I appreciate the clarification.

I would posit philosophically that the LLM cannot build off of the knowledge of others in the way that a human (like the mathematician) could, and so it is not capable of forming an original thought.

When an LLM model is trained, it is left in a sort of static state of “knowledge”. The model does not have “compounding memory” the way humans do; When a human finishes their education (training) and begins their career they usually continue to learn and gain experience throughout the course of their career.

An LLM doesn’t remember anything, not its experiences, not events that you tell it about, not the last time you prompted it. If you want to teach the LLM something new, you have to re-train the thing. It can’t learn on its own

Hey dude, thought you might find this interesting: https://mastodon.social/@tristanbuckmaster/117233413705701198

Basically, remember that math equation that we were talking about AI ‘solving’?

I said it used pre-existing formulas rather than coming up with a novel solution, and you said that’s how all math works?

Well it turns out we were both wrong: A human solved the equation and published his work a few days before AI “solved” the equation.

So it didn’t even use pre-existing formulas, it just wholesale stole the answer from someone with actual intelligence, lmao