

I can see that, I guess even practicing deployment would be useful. There’s enough weird splintering in some projects that even perceived competition can seem like trouble.


I can see that, I guess even practicing deployment would be useful. There’s enough weird splintering in some projects that even perceived competition can seem like trouble.


Why publish an experiment?
I was thinking Nick Offerman.


Also lots of thorough examination of 230s importance here: https://www.techdirt.com/tag/section-230/


I really hope you’re right. I also hope there’s an opportunity to observe and measure the impact to confirm.


It’s also likely to impact more living things (plankton, seaweed, fish, reefs) in the same space, given the locations likely to be considered, either due to biodensity or increased heat spread because of high water conductivity.


True, but that’s my point: there will be local impacts that aren’t evenly distributed.


The total effect is negligible, but even with high conductivity, local impact could be destructive enough. Even with an infinitely large copper pan, I wouldn’t put my hand on the part that’s on a stove’s burner.


If you take local temperatures of the ocean at different latitudes, they won’t all be the mean temperature of the ocean. It isn’t a single massive heat sink.
Data centers raise nearby temperatures by up to 4 degrees in Phoenix


This could be a big deal for MS, which is thought to be related to Epstein-Barr.
This is also how I think about AI training data. You have generational loss if you train AI on data that came from AI, so pre-AI data will be inherently more valuable, even as it becomes outdated.
I’ve had mine for years, repaired and upgraded it, and I love it!