

There is ecosia, although they also use the US indexes
Beruflich Web-Entwickler, privat ein Ober Nerd und Links-Grün versifft…
Musik Liebhaber, von #kpop bis #metal alles dabei
Ansonsten bin ich auch gerne mit der Kamera unterwegs.
Entwickler und Maintainer von #mbin
ich bin auch auf mastodon: @BentiGorlich
Ich betreibe thebrainbin.org, gehirneimer.de und wehavecookies.social


There is ecosia, although they also use the US indexes


The obvious problem is that the author/their instance has a vested interest in up/down votes. […] The author is interested in getting their message out. Think about someone trying to sell stuff, for example. They would want to manipulate the visibility/apparent popularity of a post. Such a party would also be most interested in the identities of supporters/detractors.
That is the same on every social media platform, including Mastodon
I don’t think likes influence visibility outside the home instance?
Likes don’t affect that at all, boosts or shares or retweets or whatever they are called affect that and are sent to the author and your followers
If you wanted to create psychological profiles, you could create bait messages and observe the reactions. That would be much more effort, but if that is a concern, then that probably isn’t good enough.
At the moment this is very easily achievable in the threadiverse. You just sub to a community and you get everything you need from that community. With my proposal this would be much harder to achieve, as you’d only get the information from people interacting with you, or, if we’d shift it to the community actor, you’d have to control the instance of the community. Sure still possible (it always will be) but a lot harder




The main reasons for me:


Only regarding to votes, but yes. So only the author receives votes and then distributes the update activities containing the new vote counts to the group and the author’s followers. I totally see the potential for abuse, I don’t if that potential is to big or if it is negligible… Mastodon seems to think it is fine…


Also sensible. What do you think of sending it only to the group actor instead of the author?


My concern is that this goes against the implicit assumption that the group actor (the community/magazine/category) is the source of truth.
The group actor is the clearinghouse of data in 1b12 style federation, and it would be a departure to change votes to only be sent to the target.
That is true. It could of course be changed to send it to only the group instead of the author 🤔
Also this goes directly against @rimu@piefed.social 's vote batching proposal.
Can you link me to it. Seems that I missed that


My problem is not saying it to the person itself, my problem is that you can build a rekatively detailed personality profile based on the things someone likes. My proposal was that everything goes to the author and the author alone


If you have malicious software, then nothing. Nothing prevents malicious software to invent users who create like activities either… So in my opinion nothing changes about that


Ah now I get it 👍


Nono the 4 heads are just 230€ cheaper than the 8 toolheads, still 669€ total


I will definitely be thinking about it, but I think the benefit is too small for me, especially at those prices…


OMG It is soooo expensive. I would’ve hoped it would be a lot cheaper…
€899 for 8 Toolheads €669 for 4 Toolheads
The prices for my servers basically increased by 30% I thought about consolidating my 3 VPSes in one big VPS for all 3 instances, but I have not gotten around to it, and I am not sure if I will actually go through with it…