Except it is a fairly good artifice of grass.

Good for what? Looking at? It’s not gonna satisfy a goat.

We only care for the look (“the output”), and we don’t expect more of it, or sell it for more than it is. That’s why it’s not a controversial term for astroturf. It wasn’t controversial for AI either until very recently. In 60 years of AI nobody has split hairs over output of intelligence. It’s justified but weirdly misdirected anger.

AI is a perfectly cromulent word for the thing.

Do you question the grass part of artificial grass? It’s obviously not grass.

Imho nothing wrong with AI use by professionals, as long as it’s verified. That obviously wasn’t the case.

BBQ your own scrolls

All AI is actual AI. It doesn’t need to be real intelligence to be artificial, should be obvious. Are you telling me artificial grass shouldn’t be called that because a goat can’t eat it?

Inference and training are separate in every ML architecture, what are you on about? And yes LLMs are ML, by definition, no need to argue.

Nah, this story has been developing since before the LLM boom. “AI” has never been rare in science headlines like this.

Our company decided to build our own ai translation system because the human translators we’ve been hiring started using AI… Quality dropped immensely, trust is lost. CEOs don’t feel like shopping around. So sad.

I was lucky I was forced to upgrade to 32gb right before the bubble, because my new job uses Jira with too many plugins.

No difference. Distillation is a valid and useful way of generating data to improve or make new models. It’s still just example data to be trained on. Anthropic is doing the same with their own models, and inadvertently every other model through web scraping.

The legal difference is that this data is uncopyrightable. At most it’s a TOS breach, nothing major.

A24’s success was always its marketing scheme: make all the movies, advertise the good ones. Once people started having expectations about the upcoming releases it was doomed.

NTFS drives have an index built-in. It’s not fit for search, but it comes with a journal and you can update a search index incrementally. That’s what Voidtools Everything does. It’s very fast and doesn’t need a background index. (I assume modern Linux drive formats can do the same)

• Isn’t “overproduced” not an antonym of slop?
• That you won’t buy it won’t make its (probable?) success less of a counterargument to this ceo’s ramblings.

Why can’t ripgrep? “Everything” search does this. https://www.voidtools.com/downloads/

For this proof to work, you’d have to prove that you can’t. And we can simulate whole worm brains and fly brains, and they behave like real in simulated worlds, so you’d have to prove that there’s something different about humans. This paper doesn’t offer anything like that.

Nah, like a 5th of the market was tied up in dot com. Hundreds of start-ups that were all supposed to take over their sector. AI is not sustainable, but it’s nothing like that.

AI would be overwhelmingly embraced if this was the case. Even a basic income program would have made it palpable.

I haven’t heard this much bubble talk ever. It’s not the same prediction made by the same people again this time. I don’t even know anybody irl who likes vibecoding (myself included) who thinks this is sustainable.

Even the ones saying it before the Dot Com bubble didn’t get it right because their doomerism made all predictions “end of the world” level.

I don’t know what you’re trying to say. People had bad takes about that bubble so all bubble scepticism is discredited? But it popped, which means all these investors had bad takes as well. So…

Nobody worth listening to thinks this bubble is going to be worse than the dotcom bubble. It’s simply not that big to begin with. I guess there’s some wishful thinking too, but what’s the alternative to this investors-expected AI growth? Everything except the AI market crashes?

Dot-com bubble took about 5 years before it burst, and that was crazier. Why would you think this one would pop quicker?

^= this guy doesn’t understand how capital captures the market