Do you have historical examples of your strategy being viable? Because to me what’s going to change things is public perception.
And once it does the same people for genocide will suddenly be against genocide. I can think of countless examples in American history. Like gay marriage.
The lesser of two evils argument is platonic. So it’s older than Jesus and at the same time no one has come up with anything better.
So to me people who abstain from voting are objectively wrong.
21 years old what the fuck. So at the end of it’s life it’s like 2012. I’m going to be honest emulation is going to dictate the legacy of the 360. At that point I’d already moved to pc but it would be good to know the must play exclusives.
More than anything consoles deliver a couch co op experience that pc just can’t match. Like I recently played obscure for xbox with a friend and it was a blast. 2 player resident evil in a high school.
On xemu I’ve played amped 2 and the 007 games they run pretty well don’t know about the whole library compatibility.
Switch to pc. Walled gardens are inherently problematic.
Really what needs to happen is a few companies consolidate regional dev talent and become software companies.
If I was sony I’d bet on steamos. Nintendo would be in the best position if their games weren’t locked to their systems. Because their wheel house is low spec games that could run on anything.
I just want to bring people back from the dead.
deleted by creator
I think the root of the problem is a pathological need for social control. Excessive wealth accumulation, sexism, racism.
The piece of information that makes me choose not to engage in this behavior is understanding the value of my own life and by extension the lives of others.
Psychology doesn’t consider a lot of this a mental illness because the behavior confers benefits to the person performing them. But if I assume abusing women online is irrational.
Then this is a child development problem.
I look at the problem first and then the second order effects. Otherwise you end up constrained by what other people think. People are irrational and the question is.
As a citizen what do I think property ownership in america should look like and where should the incentives be.
If you can get people to engage with that idea. Then they can think for themselves and there’s less room for people to put ideas in their head.
I think we need to look at housing as a technology to spread as opposed to an investment to horde. Then do the same thing with utilities.
Tons of reasons not to do it but it makes society less dependent on employment.
I think the real hole in the market is a simple device that could replace the remote control.
Just point to an example of your strategy working in history. Otherwise you’re trying to convince me with wishful thinking.