The mix?

-1 mars orbiter

According to the authors of the concept, if the resilience of a satellite constellation is ensured by its sheer number, then the response should be a weapon cheap enough to destroy satellites faster than SpaceX can launch new ones.

Smells of the good old forgeting that the target wont just sit by

At least they arent putting everything in one basket this time with physical destruction being the last option

Whats a satellite constallation destroyer but a anti ICBM weapon under a diffrent name?

What is heat but shaken atoms?

Gonna assume kelvin

Think C but what if zero was actualy zero

A bar of disappoitment

Lets hope CCA doesnt strike again

Dams normaly have a specificly designed spillway as it could otherwise be VERY dangerus (the water removeing dirt at its base , possably leading to dam failure)

I doubt the solar panels were put on it tho

If water is just overflowing it entirely like a glass of water then shits so fucked that the solar panels just dont matter

Stuff like that is regional

The satelites go around the world

May as well think of it as not as anything specific but as “the entire globe gets the same amount of bandwidth and its completely independant”

If it can support 100 people per km² then thats perfectly fine for a place where only only 10 people per km² live, but for a high density city where 10,000 people live per km²?

Its just not enough

(Numbers are purely illustrative)

Frankly im just annnoyed

There is enough to hate

Why make stuff up?

Why with all the full on nonsense im seeing in some of these comments? (Upto and includeing includeing “people should just deal with haveing shitty internet”)

Isnt nazi with fucking “mecha hitler” ,along side significantly more, not enough ?

Yep

At the end of the day it serves a purpose nothing else does

Frankly i couldnt care less about spacex (both the rockets and satelites) if anyone else even close

Unfortunatly their competitors are at a similar place to where they were a decade ago

Frankly its just about as much as anyone should care

Ohmmy’s comment is essentualy “its bad for the envirement” (as if its not true for everything) and “they should just deal with it as is” as an attempt to shutdown the arguement

I very much dont see how it would have continued any other way (excludeing a few roundabouts)

that don’t have to be constantly replaced.

Its by delibarate choice

Increase the orbit by a bit and it quickly goes from about 5 years to decades and decades for reentry

The entire point is that they will be replaceing them that often anyways, may as well get some other benefits

Last time i checked the idea was more to move stuff to asia to counter china

So its not so much reduce buget as not increaseing it even quicker

+less and less is stoping you from putting steam os on whatever computer you want

You just arent locked to that hardware

This isnt an arguement for physical media ,its an arguement against drm

Nothing is stoping sony from requireing internet connection + makeing it tied to an account so you cannot be sell it second hand

Non of what you said is inherant to the medium

Nope, you should be able to play the game on the replacement console, and any future models.

Highly doubt that such a law would be passed , it would probably be argued against the same way SKG was , just with some of the outright lies being true this time (inf support)

When the gas station with a state has issues supplying gas